A) Combination
B) Tying
C) Requirements
D) Complementary
E) Joinder
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Multiple Choice
A) That the practice violated antitrust laws because it constituted an attempted monopolization.
B) That the practice violated antitrust laws because it constituted a monopolization.
C) That PepsiCo failed to provide evidentiary support for the restrictions it urged in regard to the relevant product market and that it failed to establish an antitrust claim.
D) That while PepsiCo provided sufficient evidentiary support for the restrictions it urged in regard to the relevant product market, it failed to show that a sufficient number of customers in that market preferred IFDs over other methods of distribution.
E) That because PepsiCo had itself engaged in anticompetitive conduct, it was estopped from asserting claims against Coca-Cola.
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Multiple Choice
A) It is legal.
B) It is legal unless the items at issue may not be used together.
C) It is per se illegal.
D) If the tying arrangement leads to competitive harm, the court will likely find the arrangement to be illegal.
E) The agreement is legal only if use of the wetsuit enhanced the performance of the scuba gear which is unlikely.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) She is correct.
B) She is correct only if she has had no other antitrust charges brought against her; otherwise, private parties are allowed to bring suit.
C) She is incorrect although private parties are limited to injunctive relief only.
D) She is incorrect although private parties are limited to damages only and may not recover attorney fees.
E) She is incorrect, and a prevailing plaintiff is entitled to attorney fees and damages.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) That a rule-of-reason violation occurred.
B) That an acknowledged violation occurred.
C) That a per se violation occurred.
D) That a refusal to deal occurred.
E) That an intrastate concerted action occurred.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Congress which amends the Sherman Act from time to time to set forth additional specific offenses.
B) State legislatures.
C) Local governing bodies.
D) The courts.
E) Both state legislatures and local governing bodies.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Price gouging
B) Price discrimination
C) Predatory pricing
D) Discriminatory pricing
E) Competitive pricing
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Individuals in the fishing industry can cooperate for purposes of catching and preparing fish for market.
B) Labor unions can organize and bargain.
C) When insurance businesses are subject to state antitrust regulation, they are exempt from federal antitrust law.
D) States can set their own quotas regarding the amount of oil to be sold in interstate commerce.
E) Regulatory bodies of the airline and banking industry have authority to approve behaviors that would otherwise violate antitrust law, but the same is not true for the utility industry.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Price fixing
B) Resale-price maintenance agreements
C) Group boycotts
D) Trade associations
E) Joint ventures
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Mandatory-dealing
B) Exclusionary
C) Exclusive-dealing
D) Unilateral
E) Primary
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Section 2 of the Clayton Act
B) Section 3 of the Sherman Act
C) Section 2 of the Sherman Act
D) Section 1 of the Sherman Act
E) The Federal Trade Commission Act
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Horizontal extension
B) Market extension
C) Diversification
D) Vertical extension
E) Product extension
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) She is correct.
B) She is wrong because an agreement that a seller will only carry a seller's merchandise is per se illegal under Section 1 of the Sherman Act.
C) She is wrong because an agreement that a seller will only carry a seller's merchandise is per se illegal under the Clayton Act.
D) Additional information is needed in order to determine whether she violated either the Clayton Act or the Sherman Act because her actions will be reviewed under a rule-of-reason test with the primary inquiry being whether her actions were reasonable in view of competitive practices in the industry.
E) If the agreement lessens competition or tends to create a monopoly, the agreement is in violation of Section 3 of the Clayton Act.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Horizontal extension
B) Market extension
C) Diversification target
D) Vertical extension target
E) Product extension
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) A vertical restraint
B) A horizontal restraint
C) A corresponding restriction
D) An agreed restriction
E) A rule-of-reason restriction
Correct Answer
verified
Showing 41 - 60 of 65
Related Exams